LTV:CAC calculator with payback period
The calculator builds LTV from order value, purchase frequency, lifespan and contribution margin. It then compares LTV with your acquisition cost and shows how many months a new customer needs to pay back what you spent to win them.
Check whether your new customers pay off
- Payback period in months9.0
- Maximum CAC at 3 to 1$80
A ratio of 4.00 to 1 holds up. You earn back the acquisition cost after 9.0 months.
LTV:CAC formula with a worked example
LTV (lifetime value) is the contribution margin a customer brings over the whole relationship. CAC (customer acquisition cost) is what you spend on average to win one new customer.
| Step | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| LTV | $80 × 2.5 × 3 years × 40% | $240 |
| LTV:CAC | $240 ÷ $60 | 4.0 |
| Contribution margin per month | $80 × 40% × 2.5 ÷ 12 | $6.67 |
| Payback period | $60 ÷ $6.67 | 9 months |
| Maximum CAC at 3 to 1 | $240 ÷ 3 | $80 |
The example is healthy. The store could spend $20 more per new customer and still sit at the 3 to 1 benchmark.
What is a good LTV to CAC ratio?
The 3 to 1 benchmark comes from David Skok's guide "SaaS Metrics 2.0". He writes that the best SaaS businesses run an LTV to CAC ratio above 3, some as high as 7 or 8. He adds a second test: the best recover CAC in 5 to 7 months, and profitability turns anemic once recovery takes longer than 12 months. For online stores the rule works as a starting point, as long as you calculate LTV on contribution margin.
| Ratio | What it means | What you do |
|---|---|---|
| below 1 | Every new customer costs you money | Cut acquisition spend, check CAC and margin |
| 1 to 3 | Acquisition pays for itself, fixed costs barely | Lower CAC or grow repeat purchases |
| 3 to 5 | Healthy customer acquisition | Hold budget, scale step by step |
| above 5 | Lots of room per customer | Test more budget, you are likely leaving growth on the table |
A high ratio is not a goal in itself. At 8 to 1 you are probably winning too few customers. More budget lowers the ratio, and total profit can still rise.
CAC payback period: when a new customer pays off
The ratio tells you whether a customer pays off. The payback period tells you when. For cash flow, the second number matters more: until payback, you finance every new customer out of your own pocket.
| CAC | LTV:CAC | Payback period | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40 | 6.0 | 6 months | lots of room |
| $60 | 4.0 | 9 months | healthy |
| $80 | 3.0 | 12 months | limit |
| $120 | 2.0 | 18 months | too expensive |
Every row uses $240 LTV and $6.67 in contribution margin per month. At $120 CAC you wait a year and a half for your money, and every customer who drops out before then widens the gap.
Stores that sell consumables such as coffee, pet food or supplements can hit 12 months, because customers reorder several times a year. For furniture or electronics bought once every few years, the first order has to carry most of the CAC by itself.
LTV:CAC in e-commerce vs SaaS
Most guides on the ratio come from SaaS. There, LTV comes from monthly revenue per account and the monthly churn rate. Online stores have no subscriptions to cancel. Customers stop ordering at some point.
| SaaS | E-commerce | |
|---|---|---|
| LTV basis | Monthly revenue × gross margin ÷ churn | Order value × frequency × years × contribution margin |
| Data source | Billing system | Store backend, cohorts by first order |
| Main cost inside LTV | Hosting, support | Product, shipping, payment fees, returns |
| Main risk | Cancellation | One-time buyers, returns |
The cost block makes the biggest difference. A store pays for product, shipping and returns on every order, software pays almost nothing. Calculate LTV on revenue and a retailer overstates it far more than a SaaS company would. In the example above, by a factor of 2.5.
Blended CAC or paid CAC: which one belongs in the ratio
You can calculate CAC two ways. Blended CAC divides all marketing costs by all new customers, including those who came through referrals or organic search. Paid CAC divides ad spend by the new customers who came through ads.
| Blended CAC | Paid CAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Costs | all marketing costs | ad spend only |
| New customers | all | only those won through ads |
| Answers | Does the business work overall? | Does the next ad dollar pay off? |
| Data source | Accounting and store backend | Ad accounts, reconciled with the store |
Use blended CAC to judge whether the business model holds. Use paid CAC for budget decisions inside the ad account. If many customers arrive organically, blended CAC flatters your ads. The store-wide counterpart on the revenue side is the marketing efficiency ratio: all revenue divided by all marketing spend.
Four common calculation mistakes
- LTV on revenue. $600 in revenue ÷ $60 CAC gives 10 to 1. On contribution margin it is 4 to 1.
- Ad spend only in CAC. New customer discounts, agency fees and creator costs belong in it too. Leave them out and CAC looks cheaper than it is.
- All customers in the CAC denominator. Divide by new customers only. Returning customers who click an ad would push CAC down artificially.
- Lifespan too long. Assume five years in a store that is three years old and you count purchases nobody has made. Use what your cohorts show.
How to improve your LTV:CAC ratio
You have two sides to work on: lower CAC or raise LTV. You work on CAC in the ad accounts, on LTV through assortment, pricing and retention.
- Lower CAC: pull budget from campaigns that only collect existing customers or brand searches. The ROAS formula page shows the point where a campaign starts losing money.
- Read campaigns correctly: what a ROAS number in the ad account tells you and what it hides is covered under ROAS meaning.
- Raise LTV: more orders per customer through email, WhatsApp and winback flows. Those purchases cost no ad budget. The cost of customer retention and how the setup works are on our retention page.
- Raise contribution margin: fewer discounts, fewer returns, bundles instead of single items. Every point of margin lifts LTV and the ratio together.
Run the numbers on the first order: an $80 order at $60 CAC is a ROAS of 1.33 on revenue you keep. That order brings $32 in contribution margin, so the new customer starts $28 in the red. Repeat orders make them profitable.
Harucon works both sides at once: cut budget that does nothing and bring existing customers back through retention. What that delivered is in our results.
LTV:CAC FAQ
What does LTV:CAC mean?
LTV stands for lifetime value, the contribution margin a customer brings over the whole relationship. CAC stands for customer acquisition cost, what you pay to win a new customer. The ratio shows how many times a customer pays back their acquisition cost.
How do you calculate the LTV to CAC ratio?
Divide LTV by CAC. An LTV of $240 and a CAC of $60 give 4, or 4 to 1.
What is a good LTV to CAC ratio?
The common benchmark is at least 3 to 1, with CAC earned back within 12 months. Below 1 you lose money on every new customer.
Is a very high LTV to CAC ratio good?
Not always. A ratio well above 5 often means you invest too little in new customers and leave growth on the table.
What costs go into CAC?
Everything you spend to win new customers: ad spend, new customer discounts, agency and tool costs for acquisition. Divide by the number of new customers won in the same period.
How do you calculate CAC payback?
Divide CAC by the contribution margin a customer brings per month. At $60 CAC and $6.67 per month, payback takes 9 months.
Do your new customers pay off?
On the intro call, Tobias runs LTV and CAC with the numbers from your store and shows you where acquisition spend goes to waste. 5 quick questions, then book straight with Tobias.
Book your free intro call→